SECTEST 2011

The Second International Workshop on Security Testing

Affiliated with ICST 2011

Berlin, Germany
March 25, 2011

Home. Program. Invited Talks. Background, aim and scope. Important dates. Publication. Audience. Committees. Additional information.


Program: Friday - March 25

08:00 - 08:30 Registration
Session I Chair: Wissam Mallouli
08:30 - 09:30 Invited talk I
Prospects of Combining Security Testing and MBT
Ina Schieferdecker (Fraunhofer Fokus, Germany)
talk
09:30 - 10:00 Defining and Matching Test-Based Certificates in Open SOA
Marco Anisetti, Claudio Agostino Ardagna and Ernesto Damiani
paper, talk
10:00 - 10:30 Coffee break
Session II Chair: Keqin Li
10:30 - 11:00 Scanstud: A Methodology for Systematic, Fine-grained Evaluation of Static Analysis Tools
Martin Johns and Moritz Jodeit
paper, talk
11:00 - 11:30 Offset-Aware Mutation based Fuzzing for Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
Sanjay Rawat and Laurent Mounier
paper, talk
11:30 - 12:00 Security vulnerabilities detection using model inference for applications and security protocols
Karim Hossen, Roland Groz and Jean-Luc Richier
paper, talk
12:00 - 14:00 Lunch
Session III Chair: Luca Viganò
14:00 - 15:00 Invited talk II
Policy Monitoring in First-Order Temporal Logic
David Basin (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
talk
15:00 - 15:30 Practical Considerations in Control-Flow Integrity Monitoring
Iavor Diatchki, Lee Pike and Levent Erkok
paper, talk
15:30 - 16:00 Coffee break
Session IV Chair: Li, Mallouli, Viganò
16:00 - 16:30 Applying Assurance Techniques to a Mobile Phone Application
Padmanabhan Krishnan, Sergej Hafner and Andreas Zeiser
paper, talk
16:30 - 17:30 Free discussions

Invited Talks

David Basin (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
Policy Monitoring in First-order Temporal Logic.
In security and compliance, it is often necessary to ensure that agents and systems comply to complex policies. An example from financial reporting is the requirement that every transaction t of a customer c, who has within the last 30 days been involved in a suspicious transaction t', must be reported as suspicious within 2 days. We present an approach to monitoring such policies formulated in an expressive fragment of metric first-order temporal logic. We also report on case studies in security and compliance monitoring and use these to evaluate both the suitability of this fragment for expressing complex, realistic policies and the efficiency of our monitoring algorithm.
(Joint work with Felix Klaedtke, Samuel Mueller, Matus Harvan, and Eugen Zalinescu)

Ina Schieferdecker (Fraunhofer Fokus, Germany)
Prospects of Combining Security Testing and MBT.
The current practice for security evaluations is mainly based on system audits. Security testing did not yet gain from the advances of model-driven approaches as realized e.g. in the development of software-based systems or in functional testing. Existing security testing tools usually test specific security features without being able to test the overall system consistency wrt. its security requirements. Model-based testing approaches for security testing are expected to enable highly secure systems by early testing and test automation. These approaches should support an early identification of design vulnerabilities and support efficient system and test designs targeting security aspects. This talk will give a review on security testing and on model-based testing approaches and outline possible ways of their combination.


Background, aim and scope

To improve software security, several techniques, including vulnerability modelling and security testing, have been developed but the problem remains unsolved. On one hand, the workshop tries to answer how vulnerability modelling can help users understand the occurrence of vulnerabilities so to avoid them, and what the advantages and drawbacks of the existing models are to represent vulnerabilities. At the same time, the workshop tries to understand how to solve the challenging security testing problem given that testing the mere functionality of a system alone is already a fundamentally critical task, how security testing is different from and related to classical functional testing, and how to assess the quality of security testing. The objective of this workshop is to share ideas, methods, techniques, and tools about vulnerability modelling and security testing to improve the state of the art.

In particular, the workshop aims at providing a forum for practitioners and researchers to exchange ideas, perspectives on problems, and solutions. Both papers proposing novel models, methods, and algorithms and reporting experiences applying existing methods on case studies and industrial examples are welcomed. The topics of interest include, but are not restricted to:

This workshop is a follow-up and combination of the First International Workshop on Security Testing (SECTEST 2008) and the First International Workshop on Modelling and Detection of Vulnerabilities (MDV 2010).

Submission

We solicit both full papers (8 pages) and short papers (2 pages) in IEEE two-column format. All submissions will be peer-reviewed. Authors of accepted papers must guarantee that their paper will be presented at the workshop.

Authors are invited to submit their papers electronically, as portable document format (pdf) or postscript (ps); please, do not send files formatted for work processing packages (e.g., Microsoft Word or Wordperfect files). The only mechanism for paper submissions is via the electronic submission web-site powered by EasyChair.

Important dates

Papers due: January 4, 2011 (EXTENDED)
Notification: January 31, 2011
Camera-ready due: March 18, 2011

Publication

The proceedings will be published in the IEEE digital library.

Audience

Participation to the workshop will be open to anybody willing to register.

Program Committee

Steering Committee

Additional Information

The workshop is supported by the projects AVANTSSAR, DIAMONDS, and SPaCIoS.


Last modified: Mon May 8 10:27:24 CEST 2006